• Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        4 months ago

        Closer to 10. Yes.

        This is a pretty common thing in the American Midwest. You see it a lot around houses on the tops of hills, especially in new construction. It looks kinda silly for a few years but it’s the best you can do sometimes.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          4 months ago

          it astounds me that people don’t do this, really

          like i tend to always pay attention to how nice a property looks when i’m travelling past it, and good god it looks so much more enjoyable when you have a bunch of shade and greenery around you!

          Properties without some sort of tree/hedge wall surrounding it out in the open just look absolutely miserable and trigger a long dormant part of my brain that fears being picked off by a giant bird.

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            it astounds me that people don’t do this, really

            It’s a fire and falling hazard having trees that close to the home. There are places here in California where you legally have to have a 100 foot wide firebreak around the building, like up around the foothills where wildfires are common.

      • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Alternatively do this with bamboo (properly contained so it doesn’t spread) and it will be giant in under 1 year