HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoBrotaniclemmy.worldimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1587arrow-down15
arrow-up1582arrow-down1imageBrotaniclemmy.worldHootinNHollerin@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squarehakunawazo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 days agoThat’s not good for the environment. If you really want rich people in the oceans, you’ll need some kind of ride sharing like this:
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoBut do we need to save cybertrucks?
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoWould it be more worth it to build more efficient machines or use the less efficient ones to save time?
minus-squareobject [Object]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoUber for the rich™ I doubt that’ll work as “only poor people work as Uber drivers”, but we might solve that issue if there is no driver in the first place.
That’s not good for the environment.
If you really want rich people in the oceans, you’ll need some kind of ride sharing like this:
But do we need to save cybertrucks?
At least save the lithium
Would it be more worth it to build more efficient machines or use the less efficient ones to save time?
Uber for the rich™
I doubt that’ll work as “only poor people work as Uber drivers”, but we might solve that issue if there is no driver in the first place.