• BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.

          They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.

          Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.

          • BluesF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.