deleted by creator

(it does not exist, sadly)

deleted by creator

My friends had a chearth (couch style chair) they kept outside their house in college. It was pretty questionable. TBF it came with the house when they moved in but they did use it so…

I assume they meant conservative, not fascist.

Year of mobile linux

[ astronauts meme ]

Always has been

You should try NixOS, it’s pretty cool.

What’s a “sigma balls lmao”?

But also any crystal used in a clock is a time crystal.

Who wants to start a flame war? NixOS is a better bleeding edge distro than Arch. Nixpkgs has way more packages than Arch.

The alternatives have to exist first before the monopoly can break. One doesn’t have to think the browser will singlehandedly change the entire browser space to be hyped about more alternatives. I am just excited to see some amount of motion in opposition to the decline into the google-net. Not that this is the only thing happening but it is an interesting one that I hope pans out.

See responses to that comment.

The biggest part is that Chromium has all but taken over the browser space, and Google is additionally 90% or so of Firefox’s funding which likely gives them power even when it’s unspoken. That is to say that Google has way too much control over browsers to go along with their way too much control over internet traffic in general. The recent Manifest V3 thing and Mozillas “privacy preserving” ad personalization also likely have significant effects.

That… is not a restriction on freedom 3. You could complain about your inability to use the rust name for anything you want but that is not the same thing as your ability to distribute modified versions of the software. It is also fairly standard practice for foss software to restrict the use of such trademarks. For example, Gnome does pretty much the same thin. FreeBSD as well. Libre Office also has similar restrictions, although they are defined more nebulously. It is not clear to me what usages are allowed with the Linux trademark but they certainly do restrict who can use it and for what and you must get permission before using it. See also, about trademarks in FOSS: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9d96e1bf-bced-48f7-b5b4-ee561e7a9348

The software is free. The trademarks are not. The four freedoms are about the software and not about trademarks. You could fork Rust and call it Corrosion, just like people have forked Firefox and called it Waterfox.

Ladybird or rust?

What are you referring to? https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/licenses and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust?tab=readme-ov-file#license seem to say otherwise…

foot

Corn nuts. explain that, liberal.

Put 'em in the CONTRAPTION.