Beemo Dinosaurierfuß

  • 0 Posts
  • 59 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle

  • You comment and comment and explain and explain shit that everyone already knows.

    It is like you just recently learned what marketing is and now you feel like you know some big secret.

    Just to make it short.
    Every product in the world is marketed in a way to motivate consumers to buy.
    That is not inherently immoral.

    You said every successful game monetizes by maximizing addiction and frustration.

    I have proven you wrong by naming games that just DO NOT MAXIMIZE FRUSTRATION.

    Yeah off course even those games dangle stuff in front of you that you are supposed to buy.
    That’s the whole business model of f2p games.

    But there are different ways to get to the players money.

    There are those that indeed trigger responses to frustration.
    This is absolutely prevalent in mobile games or even those million deckbuilder games.

    But there just are also games that use other ways to make players buy mtx.
    Again, you can play PoE, LoL, CS and many other games for literal thousands of hours without ever getting coaxed into frustrating barriers like a Diablo Immortals would do to players.

    You said there aren’t. So you were wrong.

    So have fun running around with a goalpost in your hand, I am done.


  • right?

    No, still wrong.

    Obviously it is something that is not given to you for free.
    It is a product and the developers/publishers are doing business after all.

    And yes Sherlock, it is qol functionality that people playing the endgame might want and that is not included in the free version of the game.
    But every functionality that any player ever needs is available for far less than what any other AAA title costs up front.

    PoE is mainly financed by purely cosmetic supporter packs and whales.
    Is that much more ethical than what you described? Maybe not.

    But it sure as hell is not banking on frustrating the average user and thus a completely different form of monetization than the one that you just doubled down on insisting is the only one there is.
    So again as I said, you are just plain wrong.

    Oh and in CS I don’t think you can buy any functionality at all.
    Only cosmetics, that don’t do anything for you in the game.









  • Lovecraftian art is inspired by the tone and the mystery of Lovecrafts works and not by his racism.

    But that aside I didn’t downvote you for your first sentence.
    I personally wouldn’t even have downvoted you for your second sentence, even though I strongly disagree with it.

    I downvoted you for your edit, which ironically is totally tone deaf.
    Noone downvoted the fact, that you called the dude some stuff. You got downvoted for attacking Valve over an innocent sale of supernatural mystery games.


  • Having read some of his works, it sometimes is scarring to read how he pictures arabic or black peope.

    He definitely let his personal racism seep into his stories.
    So I think the argument can be made, that one shouldn’t just consume his works without critically reflecting on the author.

    There is one story set in Egypt that I remember, where the open racism kept on breaking my immersion repeatedly.

    But I agree that calling Valve tone deaf for highlighting lovecraftian games misses the spot.
    Lovecraftian art is inspired by the tone and the mystery of Lovecrafts works and not of his racism.



  • Totally different genre, but I liked how Celeste approached this.

    If you struggle to complete it there are tons of accessibility options to make the game more approachable.

    And the content necessary to finish the games story is not too much, while giving challenging -well- challenges to anyone who wants to spend more time with the game.

    And you clear the game screen by screen making it possible to only play it a short bit at a time.

    It’s almost a bonus that the story and soundtrack are fucking beautiful.






  • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.detoMemes@lemmy.mlImportant distinction
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I didn’t want to reply at all because it is starting to get ridiculous and noone else keeps reading this.

    But please just for the sake of being honest, show me where I am intolerant or hateful?
    I replied to other comments in this thread as well, there should be plenty to pick from.

    Show me my intolerance, show me my hate.

    I even make it easier for you.

    I think religion is a cancer to society.
    I think all religions are basically cults.

    Make a straightforward argument how my statements are either hateful or intolerant.

    Because while those statements are my honest opinion, I am still strongly in favour of freedom of religion.
    I would never forbid anyone from practicing their religion as long as they don’t infringe on someone else’s rights in doing so.
    I don’t hate anyone for being religious. There are wonderful religious people.

    Still I think they are wonderful despite their religion, not because of it.

    I don’t even hate you, despite your ongoing insults towards me.
    I just think you are very wrong on a fundamental level and haven’t yet learned to deal with being told so.