I feel like you’re mixing up some companies, these sentences make no sense in the context of Embracer. Are you talking about Bethesda?

No. Microsoft.

Microsoft has no such excuse. MS leadership has been asked multiple times why they did it, and they literally haven’t said a single fucking word that makes sense.

I feel like you’re defending the wrong thing here. Wondering why MS shudder the studio is like asking a snake why it attacks its prey. It’s a fucking snake. That’s what it does. That’s always what it does.

Embracer screwed up and let itself be absorbed into the Microsoft empire. They have their IP. They care about nothing else.

With infinite budget sure, worth a shot, but it would cost a lot more than the price of the phone to track it down.

Infinite budget? Bro, I know the exact location. Just go over there and knock on his door. Arrest the man and put him in jail for possession. One less thief out there taking advantage of the fact that the police doesn’t enforce the fucking laws.

The criminals could and probably do have ‘faraday bags’ to block signals from phones as they move them, only ever taken out to sell them along.

They could, but they don’t.

In a world of home surveillance, doorbell cameras, and phones with constant GPS that can tell you the exact location of where it’s at, the police are more useless than ever.

The demo was neat, but it was hilariously overhyped, even in the abstract paper. It was pretty damn obvious that the researchers were just trying to continue funding their research with a PR push.

The more interesting aspect was the potential for better AI video processing, not creating a game engine. You can’t create a game engine without a series of defined rules, and you can’t define those rules without documenting it in programming language.

Not even once.

Market Cap: 1.998B

Why EU leaders People should get off Musk’s X

FTFY.

The company added that it does not “listen to any conversations or have access to anything beyond a third-party aggregated, anonymized and fully encrypted data set that can be used for ad placement” and “regret[s] any confusion.”

That doesn’t sound like kooky bullshit to me. That sounds exactly like what the OP’s title suggests.

Okay, now you’re just trolling. Goodbye.

We also learn in the FAQ that Easy Anti Cheat will be used on PC at launch

I’m sorry, but what part of that says Denuvo or DRM?

(N.S.F.W.)

And paywalled.

From the FAQ:

Q: Does the game use DRM software (ie. Denuvo…)?

A: No.

What “at launch” part?

Yep, that’s my read as well. No idea what he’s talking about.

Is “No.” an over-specific denial?

The GPL is not a China-backed agreement. China can do whatever the fuck it wants, because that’s how dictatorships roll.

Dev being an asshole and not accept Linus’ code review = Rust is bad?

But, as the debian dude has learned… Rust programs will 99.999 % work if they can be compiled.

That’s a dumb statement. Every tool needs unit tests. All of them!

If grep complied, but always returned nothing for every file and filter, then it’s still not “working”. But, hey, it compiled!

The OP is about packaging issues with userspace utilities due to version pinning in Rust

No, it’s about Bcachefs specifically. It’s literally in the title. Discussions around Rust version pinning are a useful side conversation, but that’s not what the OP is about.

So if your Rust app is built against up to date libraries in Cargo, it’s going to be difficult to package those apps in Debian when they ship stable, out of date libraries since Debian’s policies don’t like the idea of using outside dependencies from Cargo.

As they should. You don’t just auto-update every package to bleeding edge in a stable OS, and security goes out the window when you’re trusting a third-party’s third-party to monitor for dependency chain attacks (which they aren’t). This is how we get Crowdstrike global outages and Node.JS bitcoin miner injections.

If some Rust tool is a critical part of the toolchain, they better be testing this shit against a wide array of dependency versions, and plan for a much older baseline. If not, then they don’t get to play ball with the big Linux distros.

Debian is 100% in the right here, and I hope they continue hammering their standards into people.