Not just Linux… 99% of the time you see something weird in the computing world, the reason is going to be “because history.”
Not just Linux… 99% of the time you see something weird in the computing world, the reason is going to be “because history.”
The C developers are the ones with the ageist mindset.
The Rust developers certainly are not the ones raising the point “C has always worked, so why should we use another language?” which ignores the objective advantages of Rust and is solely leaning on C being the older language.
They very rarely have memory and threading issues
It’s always the “rarely” that gets you. A program that doesn’t crash is awesome, a program that crashes consistently is easy to debug (and most likely would be caught during development anyway), but a program that crashes only once a week? Wooo boy.
People vastly underestimate the value Rust brings by ensuring the same class of bugs will never happen.
It really depends.
If I know I will never open the file in the terminal or batch process it in someways, I will name it using Common Case: “Cool Filename.odt”.
Anything besides that, snake case. Preferably prefixed with current date: “20240901_cool_filename”
People back then just grossly underestimated how big computing was going to be.
The human brain is not built to predict exponential growths!
I use IPv6 exclusively for my homelab. The pros:
No more holepunching kludge with solutions like ZeroTier or Tailscale, just open a port and you are pretty much good to go.
The CGNAT gateway of my ISP tends to be overloaded during the holiday seasons, so using IPv6 eliminates an unstability factor for my lab.
You have a metric sh*t ton of addressing space. I have assigned my SSH server its own IPv6 address, my web server another, my Plex server yet another, … You get the idea. The nice thing here is that even if someone knows about the address to my SSH server, they can’t discover my other servers through port scanning, as was typical in IPv4 days.
Also, because of the sheer size of the addressing space, people simply can’t scan your network.
Assuming the entire US court system isn’t in the corporate pocket
I love your optimism
If I remember right, the syncing issue was particularly egregious when you run windowed X11 programs on Wayland. So it could be that you got lucky.
It’s the explicit sync protocol.
The TL;DR is basically: everyone else has supported implicit sync for ages, but Nvidia doesn’t. So now everyone is designing an explicit sync Wayland protocol to accommodate for this issue.
You need to enable DRM KMS on Nvidia.
Mine is simply default KDE. The only visible thing I’ve changed is the wallpaper – changes to my desktop mostly concentrate on the “invisible” ones like shortcut keys or setting changes or scripting.
Desktop? I settled on Arch and Fedora.
Server? Debian. Although technically I never distrohopped on servers, been using Debian since the beginning of time.
Ackshually you still can blame Windows for not supporting live updates.
There are times when the original standard has zero forwards compatibility in it, such that any improvement made to it necessarily creates a new standard.
And then there’s also times when old greybeards simply disregard the improved standard because they are too used to the classic way.
To be fair: A notebook with a bunch of strong passwords is probably more secure than a human brain memorising a bunch of weak passwords.
Can’t replicate your results here. I play on Wayland, and deliberately force some games to run natively on Wayland (SDL_VIDEODRIVER=wayland
) and so far I haven’t noticed any framerate changes except statistical noise.
Still really good but I wanted it to melt my face like the end of Indiana Jones.
Truly c/BrandNewSentence material.
Seriously though, never challenge Indian and Thai cooks on spiciness. They can be ruthless!
It’s not a fork of wlroots. wlroots is a library to assist developers in creating Wayland compositors.
You ably demonstrate your own inability to listen.
Or was it you?
I’m not sure how you hallucinated that Wayland got 4 years of design and 8 years of implementation.
2012-2021, or to clarify “Late 2012 to early-mid 2021” seems to be 8-point-something years to me. I dunno, did mathematics change recently or something?
With graphics programming relatively in its infancy X11 didn’t require 15 years to become usable
I hope you do understand that graphics weren’t as complicated back then. Compositing of windows was not an idea (at least, not a widely spread one) in the 90s. Nor was sandboxing an idea back then. Or multidisplay (we hacked it onto X11 later through XRandR). Or HDR nowadays. Or HiDPI. Or touch input and gestures. We software rendered everything too, so DRI and friends weren’t thought of.
In a way… you are actually insulting the kernel developers.
For many systems out there, /bin and /lib are no longer a thing. Instead, they are just a link to /usr/bin and /usr/lib. And for some systems even /sbin has been merged with /bin (in turn linked to /usr/bin).