I don’t recall the reasons for the addition but /media is newer than /mnt.

Something to do with hard-coded mounts in /etc/fstab vs. dynamically-mounted removable media (USB drives etc.), I think.

I’m going for the Dr. Venkman combo: “Dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria!”

it’s soulless car-dependant suburbs that are like Windows!

Some suburbs are nice, too.

It’s precisely the streetcar suburbs that are nice, and they are nice precisely because they are not car-dependent.

No, because a kibbutz (planned intentional community) would be the “cathedral” in that analogy, and the city (incrementally developed community) would be the bazaar.

Linux is the communal kibbutz, Windows is the corporate city.

I was 100% with you until you decided to go and diss cities.

Cities are great and neighborhoods within them can have plenty of sense of community; it’s soulless car-dependant suburbs that are like Windows!

The funny part is that the conservatives are the ones who are, by nature, authoritarian followers.

Greater Catalonia.

And which parts does the AGPL violate? Because that’s what the article is about: it becoming available under the AGPL.

Damn who imagined that gaming would be the topic that made the FOSS OSes relevant.

Frankly, that’s been obvious for a pretty long time now. I’ve been hearing “but I need Windows for gaming” as people’s primary excuse for not switching since literally two decades ago.

C++ for kids - fine
Javascript for babies - call CPS!

Ah, I see what you mean now.

or AI scraping is not fair use, in which case they already have the copyright.

What? How would an AI company have copyright over @onlinepersona@programming.dev’s comment? That makes no sense at all.

Containerization / declarative configuration management / reproducible builds / immutable distros are hot right now because people have for a long time been sick and tired of their shit breaking when they upgrade, and are starting to realize that encapsulating changes in atomic transactions and keeping track of them better is a better way of doing things.

In other words, NixOS is riding the wave generated by the popularization of stuff like Docker, Ansible, CI/CD, etc.

I don’t think they believe that; I think they either (a) think a human lawyer would understand it during the class-action suit after the the AI scrapes it anyway, or (b) more likely, they’re doing it to make a point as a matter of principle.

Either seems pretty fucking reasonable, to be honest!

Okay,

(It’s not tho)

I only read the first few paragraphs of that article. Linking to a full article like that is like the opposite of TL;DR.

It’s even worse than you realized: each word was a separate link. 😅

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_value_tax
• https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/22951092/land-tax-housing-crisis
• https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2019/3/8/if-the-land-tax-is-such-a-good-idea-why-isnt-it-being-implemented

I did write this relatively-short comment about land value taxes yesterday though, if it helps:

No, [land value taxes are] not like property taxes.

The important difference is that when you tax only the land and not the value of the improvements on top, it doesn’t discourage improving the land to its highest and best use the way that property taxes do.

For example, downtown properties with surface parking lots on them (or similarly underdeveloped uses, like self-storage warehouses) ought to pay the same tax as the skyscrapers next door. That’s how you make it stop being profitable to build shitty surface parking lots and self-storage warehouses on prime real estate.

Ditto for building McMansions on 1-acre lots instead of bungalows on 1/9-acre lots (or better yet, townhouses or small apartment buildings) in neighborhoods just outside of downtown.

TL; DR: Just. Tax. Land!

Yes and no: yes in that the real cost has indeed drastically gone up, but no in the sense that the cost that the insurance company would actually pay would be based on the policy’s coverage limits, and I’m not sure if those have actually been adjusted to keep up…

On the contrary: as a single-family homeowner, I’m being massively subsidized compared to the amount of city services and infrastructure I consume. (It could be worse: I could have a large lot in a car-dependent suburb instead of a small lot in a streetcar suburb and therefore be even more of a leech – i.e., like those rich fucks you’re talking about – but still, I’m definitely not paying my fair share of taxes.)

If you want to know who’s really getting ripped off, it’s all the renters in dense apartments. Not only are they paying extra so their landlords can profit, they’re paying even more because they’re the ones funding the subsidy for single-family homeowners like me. Basically, I’m exploiting them via the skewed way property taxes are assessed. Thanks for funding my privileged lifestyle, people too poor/unluckly to be able to buy a house! 🤑

(But seriously, it really is very unfair and we need to reform the property tax code and, even more importantly, the zoning code.)

I was riding up the street on my bicycle the other day and actually stopped and backtracked to ask my neighbor what kind of mower he was using because I was so impressed at how quiet it was. Turns out it was a Ryobi (one of their brushless 40V models, which might matter).