Technology fan, Linux user, gamer, 3D animation hobbyist

Also at:

linuxfan@tube.tchncs.de

linuxfan@cheeseburger.social

  • 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2023

help-circle

  • Probably better to ask on !localllama@sh.itjust.works. Ollama should be able to give you a decent LLM, and RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) will let it reference your dataset.

    The only issue is that you asked for a smart model, which usually means a larger one, plus the RAG portion consumes even more memory, which may be more than a typical laptop can handle. Smaller models have a higher tendency to hallucinate - produce incorrect answers.

    Short answer - yes, you can do it. It’s just a matter of how much RAM you have available and how long you’re willing to wait for an answer.



  • OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.detoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldHardware question
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s probably a pain to set up in Windows. In Linux, it just works, there’s nothing to set up. I’m using it right now.

    OP really should have mentioned their OS.

    Edit: Actually, nevermind both my posts. I know DRI_PRIME works by using my APU for regular desktop activity, and routing discrete GPU output in whenever a game is being played. But I don’t know if it’s possible to make it use the dGPU all the time.

    Even if it did, it would only work inside the OS, so if you had to boot into the BIOS for anything, you wouldn’t have a display. So for all intents and purposes, it wouldn’t really work.


  • OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.detoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldHardware question
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I just did a quick bing chat search (“does DRI_PRIME work on systems without a cpu with integrated graphics?”) and it says it will work. I can’t check for you because my CPUs all have graphics.

    I CAN tell you that some motherboards will support it (my ASUS does) and some don’t (my MSI).

    BTW, I’m talking about Linux. If you’re using Windows, there’s a whole series of hoops you have to jump through. LTT did a video a while back.


  • OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.detoLinux@lemmy.mlIntel or AMD for ffmpeg?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    AMD APUs have Video Coding Engine / Unified Video Decoder, while Intel CPUs have QuickSync. FFMPEG’s hardware page says that AMD support is incomplete.

    You may want to ask over in !datahoarder@lemmy.ml . This topic often came up back on Reddit, and the general vibe I got was that most people prefer QuickSync. Intel may not be great in a lot of areas, but they are a beast in video encoding/decoding. That being said, I use a Ryzen APU and it’s perfectly fine. There are way more important things to look at when choosing a CPU.

    If your performance is slow, I would check your CPU is listed on the chart I linked above. Not all CPUs support all codecs.

    Edit: If your CPU doesn’t support the codec, it will still work, it just won’t be accelerated.