Except when the quantity is so low it is not even with checking.

Ah, got it, thank you. Now I just need a source of YouTube links to download on my phone :D

Yes, exactly, you can do both with Newpipe. So what is the advantage of this?

What is the advantage to Newpipe? On the PC I know why yt-dlp is king, but as an app?

Never heard anyone use “eat you out” on guys. Not sure if anal, but I think also not, since that has its own term.

This. Really. If it actually hurts to get hungry perhaps you have Helicobacter pylori. Let that get sorted out.

Indeed, if acidic etc. is what they like they can fuck right off. Of course it is better without!

I think that is the reaction of someone who’s parents did not smoke. Why would that not happen today?

Why are they not all the same number? Multiple people got the same medal? Why is this so much more often with bronze?

Wow, that is so really terrible. I was expecting the car. Sorry to hear that. How is your relationship to her?

Smoke from the car or your mom?

Everything must be made fun of.

Yes, sorry for the little error, my point is that m*Hz it is not generally speed but only in specific cases. Hz is not just “per time” but “something occurring x times per time”, like a frequency or revolutions. You can not use it for regular speed, it has to be a periodic event. That is how it is defined:

The hertz is defined as one per second for periodic events.

This is why we have Becquerels to count decay events, which are random and not periodic, but the unit is also 1/s. And for the same reason you can not use m*Bq as speed.

The first 2 paragraphs read a bit odd. I mean I specifically said that it is a tool that saves time and not what you put in my mouth. That is actually the whole point I made. The same way a book saves time compared to going somewhere, hearing about it and writing it down. Or using interactive programs instead of having to compile and upload code. Or using Python instead of C++ or C++ instead of assembly. Or assembly instead of straight binary or connecting wires or a punch card.

I also specifically say that someone without prior knowledge is not going to be able to do that. The same way someone who does not understand math is not going to be able to use a calculator or Excel in an effective way.

To take the oil change example, it is like a tutorial on how to do it yourself. But you still need to have a jack, lay on the floor, unscrew etc. But instead of having to go to a shop and learn it there, you learn it directly, which is more effective. Like reading a book about assembly instead of looking over the shoulder of the person inventing assembly. Errors can always happen and I have to say, given how much GPT improved over just 1.5 years, we are soon in the situation Wikipedia was back in the day. “Wikipedia can be edited by everyone, you can’t trust it” while in reality it was already more reliable than the encyclopedias it was getting compared to.

So the ads are “on them”? What does that mean? I have honestly no idea. Why is there a “on us”?

Speed as meter per hertz is a rather odd case, like with a machine that goes in discrete steps.

In any case, I never use implied multiplication (and others) and always simply put everything where it should be.

Define “without having their hand held”. Did they come up with all concepts themselves? Do they exclusively code in assembly? Wire their machines by hand? Operate the switches manually? Push the button off the Morse machine themselves? How far back should I go with the analogies before it is clear how nonsensical that is? I am a random hobbyist that is enabled to do such stuff because of GPT. I would not have been able to replace a broken BMS chip in my e-bike battery without GPT helping me digest the datasheet and get the register, programming procedure etc. etc. into code to read the old and write the new chip. I am not 15 anymore, I can not spend 50 hours learning some niche skill that I will never(!) use again just to fix something that is worth 200 $.

If you think that anyone can do that with GPT you are not only mistaken but at the same time I am shocked that you would not want that to be the case, just out of pettiness that you could not do it as easy but “had to learn it the hard way back in the day”. Disgusting.

I learn even less if the effort required is far too high to even try. GPT reduces this a whole lot, enabling me (and presumably many others) to do things they were unable to do previously.

I really do not understand how this community is so toxic regarding this.

The LLM is excellent at writing documentation… :D

Hence GPT to help. I build a fairly big GUI that way, far bigger than GPTs context window (about 3’500 lines), but as always we can break things into smaller pieces that are easy to manage.