JD Vance and Trump are doing a power grab to ignore checks and balances that are very basic elementary school level things that their supporters are going to suddenly pretend aren’t a thing
JD Vance and Trump are doing a power grab to ignore checks and balances that are very basic elementary school level things that their supporters are going to suddenly pretend aren’t a thing
I never said bots were the problem
it’s super easy to program bots to imitate people
Considering how dense you are tho
Hmm…
On boy are you dense. I agreed if your theory that bots are to blame is correct you have a legitimate complaint I dispute that and you got really confused and angry saying I don’t understand instead of anything of substance. Do you know what projection is?
If you think it’s bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint
An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots
You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.
Maybe try a mirror bud
I did not misunderstand your bot theory but good to see you prove my “even if I agree” point lmao
This site is maybe the worst echo chamber I’ve ever experienced it’s just one that suites my opinions. Hell even if I agree with the echo chamber but I’m the wrong way it gets rejected aggressively. If you think it’s bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint but if it’s a repost getting enough upvotes and is not weighted for controversy then it’s actually the terminally online people that know every post suffering with their obsession and not the community at large. I completely disagree with that theory
Then down vote it? Isn’t that the point of that button? I’m assuming a big problem with Reddit was they wanted controversial posts seen which took away from the power of down voting but hopefully Lemmy doesn’t? I don’t actually know though
Fine, from Red Notes very own eula, your can’t:
distorts national history and historical figures, harms national feelings, and undermines national unity;
You cannot disagree with the states narrative
Well you’re clearly a nato spy doing a counter psyop so I can ignore anything you say too. See how dumb that sounds?
You understand my claim is that there topic gets censored right? None of that is even attempting to be evidence to the contrary. I guess you’re trying to say they’re stomping down on lies spreading? That’s still censorship and I am still highly sceptical of a state that does that. It’s so weird that you want to eat that up. You weren’t there. You have to, again like I said, make assumptions about which sources to believe
There’s a concerning amount of gaslighting going on in this thread. There absolutely was and is silencing going on around Tiananmen Square: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre#Contemporary_issues
You’re also making assumptions though. And like pointed out elsewhere, mentioning Tiananmen Square still gets silenced so we’re kinda forced to assume one way or another and I generally don’t believe the state that is doing the silencing. That’s not racist and it’s messed up to jump to that accusation so quickly
It seems unusual for a dad to ask if you miss them and talk about their dick. This seems like how a partner would text you.
And thousands(?) have no lives because of this asshole. Dude killed a serial killer as far as I’m concerned
There’s also the deals that are in super short supply. I waited in line at a best buy for one of 20 TVs that were actually a very good deal. You pay with your time though in those situations
That’s just not true. Plenty of people have made a career in comp sci entirely to make money. What are you talking about?
Salt the earth