I saw from a post that you can basically host your own mini windows inside of linux to play games with, and you can choose what to share with that little windows so microsoft can’t track you in any way. Does anyone have a tutorual/guide for that? Also what Distro would be best for it?

  • cujo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It will still be subpar performance, bottlenecked by the CPU resources you can allocate to the VM as well as your original hardware’s capabilities to power the VM among many other variables. Running a VM to game will always produce subpar results. Using GPU passthrough will increase performance, but it’s almost always preferable to play on real hardware.

    The real answer will always be: if you want to game on Linux, utilize Wine/Proton and Steam/Lutris/Bottles/Heroic/some other launcher that lets you fine tune Wine/Proton to cater to the specific game.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe if you’re using type 2 virtualization bullshit like VirtualBox, but for type 1 like KVM? Performance is near identical to host CPU, the overhead is somewhere between 2~4%. Hardly something you’d ever notice.

      https://forum.level1techs.com/t/how-fast-is-kvm-host-vs-virtual-machine-performance/110192

      Wine is fine, but it comes with its lot of compatibility issues you’ll never have to deal with with a VM with GFX passthrough.

      • cujo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. I admit my experience running a VM is limited to “type 2 bullshit” like VirtualBox. But that also requires that OP have a spare GPU lying around they care enough to pop into their machine and set up passthrough for, which most people don’t. Especially with these GPU prices lately, yikes. Chances are they have a decent GPU already in their system, and buying an equivalent GPU just for passthrough is… 😬

        So while baremetal-like performance is certainly possible with a VM, it’s still not an ideal solution for most people.

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Use the iGPU for your main OS, and discreet for gaming in a VM. Works wonders and you don’t need to deal with NVIDIA drivers in your main OS. And save some energy to boot.

          • cujo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hmm that’s a neat solution. What if you do video or photo editing in your main OS, though, or any other kind of work that would benefit from discreet graphics? Is your only option then essentially two GPUs, or can you switch between passthrough neatly, or…?

            • sudotstar@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I haven’t adopted this kind of setup, mainly because Proton just does such a good job I have almost zero need for Windows, but my plan for eventually doing something like this was to also maintain a passthrough Linux VM for any GPU-intensive work on that side.

              When I realized that the practical end-state of my system would mean I’d just be running things from within the Linux VM 98% of the time (games that can run on Linux) I kind of dropped the idea.

              • cujo@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                My single remaining use for Windows is to run the CaptureOne photo editing software. It is, in my opinion, peerless. I love using it so much that it ruined basically all other photo editing suites for me. DarkTable, PhotoTherapee, ART, none of them come close for me. Everything else has some alternative that I’ve come to term with using, or even prefer using, but not CaptureOne.

                I’m only a hobbyist photographer so it’s not like my livelihood is tied up in this software… I just get tired and sour working in other softwares, no matter how long of a trial I give them. Sometimes you find a solution that’s just absolutely perfect for you and the way you work, and CaptureOne is that for me. 🤷‍♂️

                In my case, I’d have my host Linux OS for 99.99% of my use case, and then Windows solely for photo editing. But I opted not to do that just because of all my previous experiences trying to use a VM for any production level work with anything that’s graphically intensive. Apparently that has changed a lot since I last looked at it, or I didn’t dig deep enough and I missed the actually worthwhile software. I’m just not sure I’m going to put in the work. I’ve got a baby now, and haven’t taken a photo on anything other than my smartphone since she was born. 😅

    • dragnet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Super late reply here, but I was searching the Linux sub for vfio because I love this topic, lol. I’m happy to report that as others are saying, a vfio setup can be very performant! The GPU is near native, and with the proper CPU configuration, you won’t be dealing with much overhead there either. The biggest factor is the overall load on your machine from running a host OS with the guest layered on top. I use my PC host OS primarily as a QEMU/KVM hypervisor, so when I need maximum gaming performance I simply turn off or suspend operation on all other VMs to free the resources for Windows. The only game I’ve had trouble with recently at 3440x1440 is Starfield, and unfortunately I think that is more a sign that an upgrade is finally due. I’ve used this setup for all kinds of games with no problem, including demanding virtual reality titles.

      The biggest problem I’ve run into? Some anticheats truly despise any kind of virtualization. I’ve only run into issues with 2 games I like to play, but that is a real caveat. I consider it 100% an issue with the companies implementing these policies, who as I see it don’t deserve my money in the first place. But other than the initial configuration headache and extra hardware required (if you don’t have an iGPU anyway), this is the main drawback in my eyes.