minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1230arrow-down16cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1224arrow-down1external-linkDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comminnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareumami_wasabi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoThey absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
minus-squarepenquin@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoOk then, what are these politicians smoking?
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoSome of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
minus-squareDeckweiss@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agohttps://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content This independent report has been posted here a while ago. They seem to be smoking big US tech dollars.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoOr they just use one of the hundreds already written?
They absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
Ok then, what are these politicians smoking?
That’s the point
Some of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content
This independent report has been posted here a while ago. They seem to be smoking big US tech dollars.
Or they just use one of the hundreds already written?