• MJBrune@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uh, I don’t want to know exactly what you are implying but those people are still people. It’s really not okay to threaten groups like that. These are folks making a living where they can. How does that make it okay to imply that you are going to attack them?

    • thepaperpilot@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      The bit about “no” not meaning “no” means they’re specifically implying meta employees can be sexually assaulted even if they say no. I’m sure it’s said in jest, but it’s still a fairly offensive comment.

    • M. Orange@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It reads to me like they’re saying that they feel like they might be attacked by Meta employees.

      That said, it’s uh… quite a choice to have made to say that.

      • nromdotcom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, interesting. I also initially read it as a thinly-veiled threat but I think you’re right it was more of a “will i be assaulted”. Still a weird thing to say.