• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the source of the article is suspect, where is the research by tech firms with a vested interest in cloud and communication platforms publishing counter studies?

    Also, with both studies cited, the best argument is that workers are happy to work more than 8 hours a day. Does that mean you should expect workers to be on call for longer than an 8 hour day because they are working remote?

    • Pinklink@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Science. Is not about winning. Fuckface.

      You and people like you are literally inhibiting the progress of the human race for personal gain. Congratulations.

        • Pinklink@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ignores salient points made, what-about-isms to reassert bad point, doubles down on the science is a competition thing while illustrating complete lack of knowledge of scientific process

          At least you are consistent.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ignores salient points made

            I’ve responded to them, not ignored them.

            what-about-isms to reassert bad point

            I’ve said that, if you want to argue the studies presented, present other studies. The only one presented I had comments on and quoted the text.

            doubles down on the science is a competition thing while illustrating complete lack of knowledge of scientific process

            Science is about presenting data in a way that can be reviewed and verified. I’ve asked for studies that back up the assertions made while providing references to my assertions. Where is the data to back up the claim that remote work is more productive?