There was a post asking people their opinions about Edge and many people seemed to liked the idea of Edge and seemed to be ok having it on Linux (Blasphemy)

Also, can we all agree how fast Edge went from joke to a threat? I mean, it’s good now alright! It was good back then, but it’s better now. Money man!!! Money! Personally I hate MS, but I can’t help but see the fact that there is no alternative to Bing GPT and many features Bing offers on Linux.

If there is an open source ChatGPT how would it look? Who would bear the costs? How would we solve the server problem? i.e., it would take a ton of server space and bandwidth. Just wondering.

I am pretty sure MS products will improve greatly due to their integration with GPT what do us poor folks on Linux do?

Just want to know the answers, I don’t want to discuss (aka can’t comment, I need to study), but just curious!

  • pezhore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    At work today, I just heard the term, “Federated Machine Learning” - where individual corporations keep their proprietary learning data, but make the models shareable. I wonder if something similar could be done with activitypub?

    (Feel free to steal this idea if it’s worth stealing)

    • KRAW@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This doesn’t work when an important part of the process is making sure your data is actually good. If the data is proprietary, there is no way to make sure it is usable.