• sgtlighttree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t that what was specified in the original reddiquette? Downvote to maintain quality, but not to disagree?

    • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is silly though, isn’t it? Most people think most things that they disagree with are low quality by nature of being something they disagree with.

      Whatever was intended for them, IMO upvotes and downvotes work because everyone just uses them however they want, and the sum total of everyone doing that averages out to a somewhat passable quality sorting system. Trying to tell people how to use their upvotes and downvotes is just yelling into the wind.

    • cheesemonk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Think before you downvote and take a moment to ensure you’re downvoting someone because they are not contributing to the community dialogue or discussion.

      From reddiquette. You are not supposed to downvote people you disagree with so long as they are contributing to the discussion. I’m not sure if I ever saw this guide line followed in my ten years of Reddit though.

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m kinda glad we downvote the things we disagree with. Whether on topic or not, shit opinions don’t deserve to be displayed with the same prominence as reasonable opinions.

        • StinkyRedMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And that’s how a community become an echo chamber. Also assuming any opinion you agree with is reasonable and those you disagree with is shitty is silly…