I’m just tired. On the last post about having Linux at our work, many people that seems to be an IT worker said there have been several issues with Linux that was not easy to manipulate or control like they do with Windows, but I think they just are lazy to find out ways to provide this support. Because Google forces all their workers to use Linux, and they have pretty much control on their OS as any other Windows system.

Linux is a valid system that can be used for work, just as many other companies do.

So my point is, the excuse of “Linux is not ready for workplaces” could be just a lack of knowledge of the IT team and/or a lack of intention to provide to developers the right tools to work.

  • 3laws@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    hack me with 0 click interaction

    That’s very doable on Linux too.

    In other comment you said something along the lines of “just hire an expert”. They charge way more by the hour.

    Maintaining a distro for this very reason will never look ‘cheaper’ for executives. Trust me. They rather pay you to see stuff that has CLEAR and FAST deliverables, that’s what they do what they do, make/save money; take shortcuts.

    • blkpws@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, I think they are expensive because they are actually experts, not like random IT hired personal that (in my case) couldn’t even understand how OAuth works.