The title pretty much speaks for itself… I have a linux install that I’ve spent a considerable time configuring, which is unfortunately installed on a drive that’s starting to show signs of dying.

My question is: how, if there is a way, can I migrate said linux install over to a different drive, while preserving all the configurations and such.

EDIT: Thank you to everyone who commented! I made the transfer, using dd and it went mostly smoothly, even if it did take a while.

  • hendu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Assuming the new drive is an equal size or larger: Boot from a USB drive and use dd to clone the old drive to the new one. Then, remove the old drive and boot from the new one. You’ll also need to resize the partitions on the new drive if it’s larger.

    • Presi300@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah, but… how. I’m a bit terrified of dd and have only really used it to make images of drives before…

      • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I usually use

        dd status=progress conv=sync,noerror bs=64k if=/path/to/source/drive of=/path/to/destination/drive
        

        Take a reading of the drive health first with something like smartctl and if it has a lot of failing attributes, consider lowering the block size to something rather smaller like bs=512.

        Edit: To elaborate, using the sync and noerror arguments will instruct dd to ignore errors and continue in the event of read failures, while allocating zeroes to the remainder of the block space. Which is also why smaller block sizes are better for potentially failing drives. The copy will take longer, but a single error won’t take large swaths of data with it.

        • Presi300@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Hm, using a smaller block size does make sense, but I imagine that cloning an entire drive with 512 byte blocks is gonna take 10 million years. Especially this one, since the main reason I’m suspecting that it has started failing is because it’s slowed down to the point where it drags down the entire system when even the smallest of loads hit it…

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            That’s a bad sign. First off stop using it so that you don’t make it worse. Next take a backup. I think dd automatically skips over bad blocks but I don’t remember. Also, I would not go straight to another drive but instead go to a file.

            I don’t mean to freak you out but there is a chance you are going to lose data.

            • Presi300@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              I already have all data I care about backed up, so even if I lose some, it’s not a big deal

          • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            If you suspect a failing drive, you may want to consider using ddrescue as opposed to dd. The tool is specifically designed to help with failing disks.