• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Ok, visualize it like this:

    Draw yourself, with a small mirror at head height, a meter away. Draw your reflection at the same distance from the mirror on the other side.

    Now do that again, but place the mirror 10 times further. Then draw lines from your eye, to the edge of the mirror, and to the reflection.

    You’ll reach the same point on your reflection.

    Edit: or let the BBC do it for you; https://www.bbc.co.uk/bang/images/dallas_mirror_diagram_large.gif

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Ok, I can see the point, but it’s not usually what people mean when they can see their whole body. In that example, you’re looking down or looking up. You never see your whole body at the same time. For your whole body to be entirely in your field of view, it absolutely does matter how close or far you are from the mirror. You can test it by going closer and further to any mirror.

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yes, I have.

          Have you tried it? Find a mirror big enough to show your whole body and press your face right up to it. Do you see your whole body? Now take a step back, do you see your whole body at the same time without having to look and up and down? Now walk several steps back and notice how much more you can see without moving your eyes.

          We’re talking about 2 separate concepts is the problem.

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Ok, so, your point is that eyes have a limited field of view? Yeah, that’s something totally different, and not at all what this was about.