Find all the best dev content at https://daily.dev/fireshipRemember, for every paid SaaS, there is a free open-source self-hosted alternative. Let's take a l...
  • howrar@lemmy.ca
    2·
    18 days ago

    An important component of the cost to consider is how long we expect a company to support a piece of software, and how much it would cost to migrate everything when they drop support. FOSS wins in this regard, especially if you can get a support contact with the devs.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      3·
      18 days ago

      Neither wins here. I cannot tell you how many libraries I have had to replace because FOSS devs move on. It’s probably greater than the number of products I’ve had to abandon for lack of support but I’m not sure what that is at a percentage level. In the DevOps world everything burns constantly, paid and free.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        2·
        18 days ago

        It wins in the sense that you still have access to the software and code, and you have the option to either hire someone new to maintain it or switch to something else. Closed source proprietary software only leaves you with the latter choice.