I made a post a few days ago asking your opinion on Manjaro and it was very mixed, with a slightly negative overall opinion. I heard some recommend EndeavourOS instead and did some online research and it seems to be pretty solid and not have the repository problem that Manjaro has.

Just for context I am a Linux noob and have only used Mint for about the past six months. While I don’t have any major complaints, I am looking to explore more distros and the Arch repository with its rolling releases. I am not a huge fan of how certain packages on apt are a few years old and outdated. However, I also don’t have the time to be always configuring my OS and just want something that works well out of the box.

Is EndeavourOS a solid choice?

  • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    49·
    1 year ago

    It’s literally Arch Linux but with an easy bundled installer and a couple of small tools you’ll forget about.

    I am using it until the archinstall script gets easier for dual-boot, encrypted BTRFS configs.

    I kinda wished the EndeavourOS team made efforts to improve archinstall and simply bundled their couple extra tools as that, extra tools for easier Arch Linux usage, instead of branding it all like a new distro.

        • zelifcam@electricpaper.love
          2·
          1 year ago

          Why would it not? I think maybe a few times in 20 years I’ve come across an installer that didn’t let you do custom partitioning.

            • zelifcam@electricpaper.love
              3·
              1 year ago

              Where? I don’t know who’s project your referencing?

              Actually, I don’t care enough. I didn’t realize I responded to your follow up to someone posting their custom install scripts. I meant generally that’s not an issue I’ve ever come across. Then again, I don’t tend to install distro’s that simply add a couple custom wallpapers and welcome app. I’ll stick with base install from the source.

    • Display Name@lemmy.ml
      8·
      1 year ago

      Endeavouros uses calamares. They just make it possible to install arch very easily and with a gui. What’s the advantage of archinstall over it? Eos isn’t too different from arch. It’s arch with a gui installer.

      • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
        13·
        1 year ago

        Yes! That’s the point. It’s just Arch with a GUI installer, quite literally. So, why not simply make the archinstall script better? Or simply make an installer for Arch Linux? It’s like you take your grandma’s cookies and put a sticker of your face.