I thought odysee is a better alternative for youtube and offers much more privacy. But it’s not. So disappointed.

Feeling hard to quit youtube because of other platforms doesn’t have much better or quality contents expecially no instance of peertube is truly usable. 🤥

  • land@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know what technology YouTube uses, but I can easily play videos directly on YouTube even with my poor internet speed. However, other front-ends like Piped, FreeTube, GrayJay, NewPipe, LibreTube, and Invidious struggle to stream videos smoothly and experience too much buffering.

    • Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because at youtube scale, they can afford (kinda) to put local cache servers all over the globe and have every video rendered at all quality settings at the same time.

      • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        As well as being able to move between the quality settings more or less imperceptibly if the bandwidth changes. Similar to Netflix and Prime.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This was a big story with Netflix and ISPs about 15 years ago. If I can find a link, I’ll post it.

    • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The answer is simple, they are not the right way so YouTube doesn’t offer them a real way to fetch content. So it adds a first layer of latency for the alternatives as FreeTube and NewPipe (I actually don’t know so much about GrayJay). And after adding a bit of latency, you increase this by going trough a server for Piped, LibreTube and Individious.