I have been an Android user for 13 years now. After using almost every Google service possible I am going down the privacy rabbit hole lately. Gmail -> Proton Mail, Chrome -> Firefox, Keep -> Notesnook, Google Search -> Kagi, …

I am currently using a Galaxy S23 with as few Google apps as possible (and focussing mainly on open-source apps). I am familiar with rooting (I was a CyanogenMod user back in the days), but today I want to use the phone without tinkering and problem solving. I also like to use a smartwatch and banking apps, so GrapheneOS is a no-go unfortunately.

So it is “Stock” Android (or Samsung’s Android ) vs. iOS for me. Is it better (in terms of privacy) to use an iPhone or stick with an Android phone with an system wide ad-/tracking Blocker (I use Adguard)? It seems there are more privacy-friendly/open-source apps on Android.

  • glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    iPhone has the better reputation for privacy/security, however it is proprietary software and so no one can really tell for sure what kind of data that Apple might collect on you.

    • Matt@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same is true for stock Android devices. Unless you are using a custom ROM without Google Play Services, there is more proprietary software than open source running on Android devices.

    • Tibert@compuverse.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The best fasle advertising on privacy/security rather?

      Their goal is blocking any other advertising method so only they can collect and use the data of their users for advertising.

      Security? They can (or could) be hacked, with a backdoor, just with an invisible message…

      So most of their reputation is just marketing (which goes pretty near to false advertising ex : the your data stays on your device… Which is just false).

      Tho they may have a reputation of refusing to give data to public organizations (or at least depending on the data).

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is that true? I thought apple’s business model was to not sell your data but charge more upfront. Do you have a source discussing this that you can point me to?

      Edit: I’ve searched online and can’t find even a single article talking about Apple selling your data. I’m an iPhone user so I want to know. The most recent Apple privacy article I can find reports on how they’re closing fingerprinting loopholes in third party apps.

      I definitely don’t want to be naive or credulous, but given how aggressively they’ve prevented third parties from gathering data, I’m cautiously optimistic. I don’t think this is a “both sides” situation, unless someone can point me to some information to the contrary.

        • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. Installing any .api is extremely simple. You can do it with one click. I’ve lots of apps Apple doesn’t want me to have, and they don’t know.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem to be right: here is their app store policy. That’s helpful to know. They claim this is not sold to others and only used to recommend apps on the app store, but I may not be reading that right.

          In theory, I understand some apps can be sideloaded on Android. But, in practice, can you actually get away with avoiding the Google app store for most apps? I’m skeptical.

          • ponfriend@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            All apps that you can install from the Play Store can be “sideloaded” on Android, plus many that you can’t install from the Play Store.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Aurora store and fdroid are two alternative stores. You can also download any apk and install it. You were skeptical of a 1 minute search, man.

            • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              No please read my comment again. I know there are alternative stores. In practice, many mainstream apps are not easy to install using these stores. If you had done a 1 minute search, you’d find tons of people complaining about trying to degoogle their phone. I think almost everyone just gives up on at least a few apps.

              • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Giving up on a few apps IS being able to sideload most apps, which is what you were skeptical about in your original comment.

                • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  In context, I clearly meant “most apps people use and need”. Almost all the streaming apps, all the corporate social media apps, all the payment apps, etc seem to be problematic.

                  Remember that the larger discussion is about the viability of protecting your privacy on Android vs iPhone. Sure everything is “possible” if you futz with it enough, you could even code your own OS and all your own apps, but the more you have to futz, the less viable it is for most people.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought apple’s business model was to not sell your data but charge more upfront.

        Charging more? Absolutely. Not sell your data? No, they will sell.

        Charging more is only because people are willing to pay it. So why not? Most people don’t even care about their data being sold, and will not stop buying apple products for it.

  • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tend to lean toward Android simply because it gives me more control/options instead of completely relying on Apple’s promise that they care

    E.g. I like that I can use NeoStore for FOSS apps instead of the google Play store

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s Stock vs iOS, do you really care about privacy? Google is a data mining ad company, that’s why their stuff is free. “If you’re no paying for the product, you are the product”. So Apple right? LOL no. Paying is no protection against being sold too. It’s closed, you’re never know, so they might as well make more money from you.

    The only way is having any confidence in things is open source.

    So I don’t think iOS vs Stock matters. Android is more open, but all those root level closed Google services completely compromise the phone. They owned the phone.

  • Im28xwa@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stick with Android, you have much more control over the phone even when running stock compared to iOS Besides using Adguard you can also disable the apps you don’t want (some of which are used purely for tracking) using universal Android debloater and also turn of all kinds of tracking in the system

  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    iOS is fully proprietary, so while some might argue that it is more private, it is almost impossible to know. What we do know is that it isn’t private, and apple has a track record against privacy.

    I think comparing the two platforms from a privacy perspective is pointless. You’re not going to be private either way. Might as well focus on other factors.

      • annoyedcamel@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        All I know is LineageOS claims to support devices beyond the date manufacturers do. Graphene stops getting updates the same date the manufacturer sets.

      • jacktherippah@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        LineageOS doesn’t claim to be Degoogled, and it isn’t so I think it would be an improvement, but a small one. It would remove the trackers your OEM has built into stock but that’s about it. It’s still phoning home to Google.

  • navatar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My banking app works just fine on GrapheneOS, and it’s required no tinkering to get it working the way I want. I can’t speak for smart watches unfortunately, but I’d still recommend a Pixel with GrapheneOS if you really care about privacy. If you really don’t want to go with GrapheneOS, I’d still recommend Android. Apple may be marketing towards privacy friendly, but Android still has better FOSS options, which is better than blindly trusting Apple.

    • ritchie@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish I could buy a second hand pixel phone anywhere here. (Central EU) They might be popular in the US, maybe a couple of them are sold in western Europe, but in this region they are imppssible to find.

  • topRamen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Stock IOS is probably more privacy friendly than android. Googles entire business is to make money off your data. Stock android uses google play services that have access to pretty much everything on your phone. Apple will bend to politicians on scanning your files and shit, but at least they (probably) aren’t selling your data. As much as google at the very least.

    But like many comments here, if you actually care about privacy, stock anything isn’t the way to go. I use calyxos and find it to be a good balance between privacy and usability. No android auto, but banking apps work and from what I’ve read you can use garmin smartwatches or other similar watches that use their own app and smart watches that have been added to gadgetbridge https://f-droid.org/packages/nodomain.freeyourgadget.gadgetbridge/

    Some people don’t like microg, but I believe you can use calyxos without it. (Not sure if that will break banking apps though).

      • ritchie@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        On my phone e os came with microG preinstalled. Banking apps work. The only thing not working is payment with apps that want to use gpay. (Udemy, e-scooter renting) I could install google wallet, but I don’twantt any google app on my phone.

    • bzz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally Apple apps e2e encrypt your data and can not be read/mined by them. There are caveats such as Siri (anonymized voice clips uploaded for example) or (iirc) Apple News. Things like notes, fitness/health, or iMessage are your data.

        • bzz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It is a business risk for Apple to mine data on data they have explicitly confirmed in this ToS to be e2e encrypted and private.

          If we’re going that far, none of the Broadcom/Qualcomm/Exynos/Snapdragon chips have open source firmware. Additionally google services are all closed source and proprietary.

          Backdoors exist but all phones have backdoors in them and should be assumed they are exploited by state actors.

          From a privacy standpoint, on stock mobile OS, Apple is the lead. I certainly won’t disagree that there are custom roms without google services that are superior though.

          • settinmoon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree. I work in tech and having a secret back door opens you up for potentially billions of dollars of lawsuits and all it takes for everything to blow up is one whistleblower.

  • moddy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Was in the same Situation. Tried calyxos and lineage os with microg but there were always issues. I wanted a phone that works, so I bought an iPhone. I know that is not at all the best way to have privacy, but it works. I try to use as much open source and selfhosting as possible to minimize the data Apple gets. https://github.com/dkhamsing/open-source-ios-apps

    • Persen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You could try grapheneos. It is praised a lot. I can’t comment on it as I don’t own a pixel.

      • moddy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I now have a pixel with grapheneOS but unfortunately it is the same problem with the location in some apps.

  • Lolors17@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you like a Smartwatch-like experience, just try out the PineTime. Been using it now for 5Months and it’s been great so far.

  • hanke@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I use and strongly recommend iodé OS

    It is a degoogled android version with a built in ad blocker and microG. All my apps including banking and such work like a charm.

    Since tha latest update it’s been great.

    • Vexz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Afaik on Android smartwatches (and the OP said he uses a smartwatch) don’t work (properly?) without the Wear OS app. And the Wear OS app doesn’t work without Google services. This means the OP can’t live without Google services at the moment.

      • hanke@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        microG is an open source implementation of the google play services. If it is compatible with wearOS I am not sure, but it might be.

        I have a Garmin activity watch and it works with no issues. Also had a Samsung one that worked well. Though none of those are wearOS devices.

        • Vexz@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve read that there’s no way around Google services if you use a WearOS watch. Not even MicroG is a solution. Anyway, the OP didn’t mention what type of smartwatch he uses. So if it’s not a WearOS smartwatch he should be fine I guess. :)

  • DengueDucky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can make stock Android much more private. Universal debloat tool + Invisible Pro - remove unnecessary apps, restrict internet access to only the apps you want to have internet access, add a tracker blocker list.