No it doesn’t. How does it prove Deckard is a replicant versus proving Tyrell Corps had become just that good at replicating life. In both Blade Runner movies to prove something was replicant they had to get electron microscope close to find printing on cells. Perhaps Rachael was just that human. Unless it was explained somewhere I missed.
Nobody claimed they’re genetically manipulated humans. They’re organic but man-made, and apparently it’s very hard to tell the difference to a real human except through emotional responses.
She doesn’t have to have human DNA in other body parts tho. It doesn’t make you human if you only store some DNA in a device for reproductive purposes.
No it doesn’t. How does it prove Deckard is a replicant versus proving Tyrell Corps had become just that good at replicating life. In both Blade Runner movies to prove something was replicant they had to get electron microscope close to find printing on cells. Perhaps Rachael was just that human. Unless it was explained somewhere I missed.
deleted by creator
Nobody claimed they’re genetically manipulated humans. They’re organic but man-made, and apparently it’s very hard to tell the difference to a real human except through emotional responses.
deleted by creator
Why can’t they make a robot that can have human babies? Sounds possible in the realm of SF
deleted by creator
She doesn’t have to have human DNA in other body parts tho. It doesn’t make you human if you only store some DNA in a device for reproductive purposes.
Please refrain from such language in the future. Everyone. Let’s keep it civil, please.