• capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The calculus changes when everything from ambulances to children could be actual, literal bombs.

    Edit: oh and, Israel isn’t the only country that borders Gaza.

    • ???@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The calculus changes when everything from ambulances to children could be actual, literal bombs.

      That’s a really weird way to say, “I’ll kill any Palestinian that moves, even the cattle, because I can’t even bother viewing them as human beings”.

      Would it be acceptable if someone shot an Israeli ambulance, saying, “well, you never know these days, these ambulances are full of IDF ready to attack!”?

      Nope, and neither should the opposite.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Nope. No you don’t get to go down that road. We dealt with that uncertainty in Iraq without causing a massive famine or using 2,000 pound bombs. There are no excuses for genocide, and certainly not victim blaming.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        It sounds like you’re saying if Jihadists use ambulances and children then there’s no defense. Just lay down and die.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Sounds like you’re trying to lump every person in Gaza in with Hamas. Professional soldiers have procedures for those situations. Ones Israel isn’t using.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not.

            I’m very clearly saying that when you’re fighting a group who straps bombs to kids, you have to consider that even those appearing to be regular civilians might be a threat.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Oh but you are. Because we’ve done this. We know how to deal with those problems without committing a genocide. The only reason to answer charges of genocide with , “but the kids might have weapons!” Is to blame the victims.