TLDW from ChatGPT:

The video is a critique of the Debian Linux distribution’s website and its user experience, primarily focusing on the difficulties in finding and downloading the appropriate ISO images. The presenter praises Debian’s stability and community but criticizes the website’s design, stating that it’s not user-friendly, especially for new Linux users. The video highlights how the website layout, multiple clicks, and confusing file tree structure can make it challenging to locate the desired ISO images, particularly for the live installer versions. The presenter suggests that while improvements have been made, the ISO download process can still be convoluted and feels like the distribution is not encouraging new users. The overall message conveys a desire for Debian to make its ISOs more easily accessible and user-friendly.

    • guillermohs9@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but there is a point. I’m not a Linux newbie, but sometimes you can get lost looking for the iso file that includes firmware, or non-free, or certain desktop. On most distro’s pages, the big fat button leads to a direct link to the iso file and another to a torrent at most.

      • quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I do agree that the website is bad, nowadays the main iso includes non-free firmware, and it’s the same installer for all DEs.

        • guillermohs9@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well that’s nice, I think last Debian I downloaded what buster or something so I might have been talking about old experiences. They’re still making the user navigate through an FTP-like file structure to find the current amd64 iso?

            • biddy@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I gave it another shot having not attempted for a few years, I was looking for the most complete, stable, non-free, offline, x64 image for a USB flash drive. I failed very quickly because I didn’t know whether I needed a CD or DVD image. A few minutes of clicking through random and irrelevant “FAQs” and I finally found an answer I understood but only through experience, CD images are smaller than 700mb and my flash drive is large, so I wanted a DVD image. Back to the top, and I found the image I needed.

              So it took a few minutes, and I’ve done this several times before. A new user would have absolutely no clue.

              • quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re describing that you want something that isn’t the standard installer, with the ability to do offline installs. A new user with no clue about anything would probably just use the top link and run the graphic installer, ending up with the same system as if he/she had downloaded the dvd version. Is your criticism that internet is a requirement for the standard installer?

                • biddy@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Kind of. My criticism is that a new user will end up with that net installer without realizing it, which may not be what they want, confusing them further. Bypassing the website is not a good solution, there’s important information there like the install guide. ISO downloads are only one example of how the website is hard to navigate, even if they manage to skip that step it’s only going go make it harder in the future.

                  • quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I see, so then there are two options: 1) Make the full offline installer the default, or 2) put all options side by side and explain the difference.

                    The first option isn’t good because any default will not fit everyone, there will always be someone looking for what isn’t the default. The second option would just be confusing for the person who knows nothing about computers. “I have to read a wall of text to decide what to download? This is too much!”

                    I mean, there’s no way to win here. Is there any OS avaliable that can have one installer that fits exactly everyone, or a way to have a list to choose from if the user knows nothing about the choices?

                • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Correction. A new user, meaning an actual normie Windows user rather than a nerd like people in this discussion, will get absolutely nowhere trying to install Debian. “Here’s the ISO” means nothing to the average person and anyway that’s only 5% of the process of getting the thing up and running.

                  • quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Would a normie Windows user know how to install Windows on a computer without OS? Of course, this hypothetical user doesn’t have to, because he/she probably bought a computer with Windows pre-installed. Is there any OS in the world that is easy to install if you don’t know what an iso file is? Which measurement are we using when the claim is that Debian is difficult to install? What is an easy install?

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You gotta download it either way, netinstall or not. At least that way you can pick and choose what you actually need. Are you trying to set up a computer in the woods?

        • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sometimes, yeah. There are a lot shit networks out there.

          With the full, I can at least get a functioning base system without needing a network connection. With the net, network no worky, no Debian.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ISO is one tenth of the problem. The average non-techie Linux neophyte is not going to have a clue what to do next once they have downloaded this ISO thing, even if they somehow managed to pick the right one. Debian’s onboarding for ordinary users is just disastrously bad.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why does every single distro HAVE to cater to noobs? If someone wants “easy” Debian, then they can use Mint or Ubuntu. Debian is the distro you go to once you’ve outgrown those two. It’s meant for technical applications, like servers and network infrastructure, not really something like casual browsing or gaming.

        • nik282000@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone who uses Debian for browsing and gaming, I agree. It is a tool that you pick because you have a goal in mind and I pretty much never recommend it as an intro to Linux for new users. The only reason I continue to use it as a desktop/laptop is for consistency between all my machines so I don’t have to remember how to use 8 different package managers.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anecdata: I used Debian before using Ubuntu. Debian is not just for servers, it works fine on personal computers. And ethically it is better than Ubuntu, more so now than ever. But the onboarding process is a mess. When I have just replaced my laptop and I’m on bad wifi struggling to ditch Windows, and I don’t have a piece of paper handy with all the arguments on an obscure dd command, and I risk bricking my machine, I need a bulletproof onboarding process. That was why I moved to Ubuntu. I never cared about “outgrowing” an OS, my concerns are more about privacy and ethics. Well, one would hope that these things might be available to all people one day. That was what Debian was supposed to be for.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apparently by “people” you are referring to experienced technical users like yourself. Everyone else will need to learn what an ISO is, which one is needed, and how exactly to transform that file into a bootable USB stick. This means intense hand-holding from beginning to end. Which is possible, because other distros manage it. Debian does not.

        • nik282000@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If a user is that far down the technical literacy ladder, they do not need Debian, they need Ubuntu or Mint or one of a dozen other distros that prioritize UX over production.