You must log in or register to comment.
“Hand-written assembly” is not more powerful than any other Turing-complete language (including Perl and Python), just more painfully slow and prone to human error to write. (Perhaps if you have a special case requiring speed (such as the processing being done in a tight loop in a financial trading app and the results needing to beat rival trading systems by milliseconds or something equally esoteric), it’d make sense, but in that case, a modern compiler (for, say, C/C++/Rust or similar) would yield comparable results, and if a lot is riding on those milliseconds, you’d eschew code and build a FPGA that pulls the data out of memory buffers in hardware or similar.)
So these days, the only use case for hand-writing assembly language (other than low-level OS/firmware programming or compiler development) is performative Feats Of Strength, where the challenge is the point. And in that case, you’d be trying to do something heroically challenging, like writing an Atari 2600 demake of Baldur’s Gate or something.
Hand written assembly is much more powerful than a turing-complete high level language because it lets you fuck up everything. Rust and python are way too wimpy to allow a user to destroy their computer.
On the other hand you can’t really have UB in code written in asm.
Just throwing that out there!
What, no LaTeX?!
that is the white portion of the diagram.
The diagram was actually written in LaTeX.
Grep is as high power as vim and emacs??? In what universe?
When combined with sed, sure, but the difficulty ratings should be swapped.
And vim/emacs are rated just as difficult as a programming language
Should they be more or less difficult, though? Really basic coding seems easier to me than remembering an endless soup of hotkeys I’ll rarely need.
Not sure why you’d remember the ones you rarely need. I just memorized the things I use. Remembering stuff you use is much easier than learning a programming language. I’ve been programming for over 30 years and I’ve been using vim as my only “IDE” for the last 14 years. It would take me significantly less time to teach someone vim than to teach them programming.
See, the thing with Vim is that I don’t actually know which of the endless features I need. I don’t really feel like I’m missing much with the basic text editors.
Maybe you could shine some light on it for me? Right now I’m the sideways-glancing monkey meme every time IDEs come up.
For me it’s just convenience. It’s not because vim is better, but because it works on any terminal. I don’t depend on a particular IDE setup, I can jump on any computer and start working. And since I’ve been using it for so many years I’m very fast in it. The best tool is often the one you know best.
Programming languages is way too broad a category. There’s a lot of variation in both power and difficulty.
What about the one that should be in the top left, both high power and easy, interns.
Pretty sure text editors allow a lot of power, in the upper half in any case
AI chatbots should be near I Ching divination.
I Ching divination
That’s why I use icsh, the I Ching Shell.
What, no Microsoft Word?
I Ching divination
I don’t understand why it was put in the middle, it should be in the lower right corner, lowest power, and highest difficulty.
I think it was supposed to be an insult to everything lower, but the easy-weak quadrant doesn’t deserve that.
I, as one of the ten people on the planet who writes awk scripts, noticed the most powerful text processing tool is missing.
I’m environmentally damaged enough to honestly think that perl should be further left. It’s pretty easy, but I’m the first to admit that perl code looks like ass.
Spreadsheets are actually running the world.
I like that this clearly articulates that text editors are just whatever the hell vim & emacs are, with training wheels
My pandoc scripts are fairly easy to use, I think…
WYSIWYG editors rock. Long live TeXmacs!
